Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume 60, Issue 5 , Pages 273-278 , December 2009

SKyphoplasty

References 

  1. Lin W, Tien-Tsai C, Lee Y-C, et al. New vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty: retrospective analysis of risk factors. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:225–232
  2. Kim SH, Kang HS, Choi JA, et al. Risk factors of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebra after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:440–445
  3. Munk PL, Legiehn GM. Musculoskeletal interventional radiology: applications to oncology. Semin Roentgenol. 2007;42:164–174
  4. Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(Suppl 1):21–50
  5. Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, et al. Percutaneous polymethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1897–1904
  6. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, et al. Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology. 1996;199:241–247
  7. Hu MM, Eskey CJ, Tong SC, et al. Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fracture via a unipedicular approach. Pain Physician. 2005;8:363–367
  8. Seel EH, Davies EM. A biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty using a balloon tamp versus an expandible polymer bone tamp in a deer spine model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:253–257
  9. Tong SC, Clifford JE, Pomerantz SR, et al. “Skyphoplasty”: a single institutions initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1025–1030
  10. Zheng Z, Kuang G, Cheung KMC, et al. Preliminary clinical outcomes of percutaneous kyphoplasty with Sky-bone expander. Chin Med J. 2007;120:761–766
  11. Foo LS, Yeo W, Fook S, et al. Results, experience and technical points learnt with use of the SKy Bone Expander kyphoplasty system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study of 40 patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1944–1950

PII: S0846-5371(09)00152-1

doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.07.004

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume 60, Issue 5 , Pages 273-278 , December 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution