Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume 61, Issue 2 , Pages 102-108 , April 2010

Computer-aided Detection in Computed Tomography Colonography with Full Fecal Tagging: Comparison of Standalone Performance of 3 Automated Polyp Detection Systems

References 

  1. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology. 2001;219:685–692
  2. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191–2200
  3. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:41–48
  4. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004;291:1713–1719
  5. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904
  6. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1207–1217
  7. Ferrucci J, Barish M, Choi R, et al. Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy. JAMA. 2004;292:431–432
  8. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005;236:3–9
  9. Taylor P, Potts HW. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:798–807
  10. Wiemker R, Rogalla P, Blaffert T, et al. Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:46–56
  11. Fletcher JG, Booya F, Summers RM, et al. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:277–282
  12. Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Rückert JC, et al. Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology. 2005;236:184–188
  13. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160
  14. Näppi J, Okamura A, Frimmel H, et al. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2005;12:695–707
  15. Näppi J, Yoshida H. Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography. Med Image Anal. 2008;12:413–426
  16. O'Connor SD, Summers RM, Yao J, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve. Radiology. 2006;241:426–432
  17. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1832–1844
  18. Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:168–174
  19. Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:77–81
  20. Jerebko A, Lakare S, Cathier P, et al. Symmetric curvature patterns for colonic polyp detection. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9:169–176
  21. Halligan S, Taylor SA, Dehmeshki J, et al. Computer-assisted detection for CT colonography: external validation. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:758–765
  22. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1690–1699
  23. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology. 2008;246:148–156
  24. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology. 2008;246:463–471

PII: S0846-5371(09)00195-8

doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.10.005

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume 61, Issue 2 , Pages 102-108 , April 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution