« Previous
Next »
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume 61, Issue 5
, Pages 280-285
, December 2010
Bowel Preparation Regimen for Computed Tomography Colonography
References
- CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed set of minimum data set for study reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904
- . Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:377–393
- Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1207–1217
- . Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study. Radiology. 2007;242:152–161
- . Perceptive errors in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:556–570
- Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2005;37:937–944
- CT colonography: false negative interpretations. Radiology. 2007;244:265–273
- Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191–2200
- Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005;365:305–311
- CT colonoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403–1412
- . Colorectal cancer screening on stronger footing. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1285–1287
- CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4459–4504
- . Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:556–560
- Lee VHM, Chan CK, Kwok KH, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a single unit analysis. Abstract 4595_113 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 77th Annual Scientific Congress. May 2008, Hong Kong. Available at www.blackwellpublishing.com/racs2008/abstract.asp?id=71245.
- CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:32–42
- Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:158–167
- Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:657–665
- Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there a risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;10:905–911
PII: S0846-5371(09)00276-9
doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.12.008
© 2010 Canadian Association of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume 61, Issue 5
, Pages 280-285
, December 2010
